Ms Masindi Mphephu. Photo supplied.

Toni no longer king

Date: 12 April 2019 By: Anton van Zyl

Viewed: 13647

Toni Mphephu Ramabulana is, for now, no longer the king of the Vhavenda. The Supreme Court of Appeal delivered its ruling on Friday morning, declaring former President Jacob Zuma’s ruling that he be declared king invalid.

The Supreme Court judges found that the former president’s decision was unlawful, unconstitutional and invalid. The decision of the Mphephu-Ramabulana Royal Council to identify Toni Mphephu Ramabulana as the incumbent was set aside because it was based on a criterion that promotes gender discrimination. The court ruled that the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Amendment Act places an onus on the parties to progressively promote gender representation.

The case will now have to go back to the Thohoyandou High Court where a judge other than judge Ephraim Makgoba will have to adjudicate the merits of the case.

In the court order, the country’s president and the Limpopo premier are instructed to refer certain issues of customary law to the Limpopo House of Traditional Leaders and the National House of Traditional Leaders for an opinion and advice. These Houses must advise the High Court on measures that are in place for the adaptation and transformation of the principle of primogeniture by the traditional communities, in line with the requirements of the law.

Another issue that needs to be clarified is the role of the ndumi and whether he or she qualifies to be recognised as a successor. Guidance must also be provided as to whether a child who was born prior to his or her parent's being recognised as a traditional leader qualifies to be a successor.

The highly controversial case served before the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in November last year. In the case, Masindi Clementine Mphephu, the daughter of the late Paramount Chief Tshimangadzo Mphephu, contested the Vhavenda kingship/queenship. She opposed the decision of former President Zuma to appoint Toni Mphephu Ramabulana as king of the Vhavenda. Her legal team argued that she was discriminated against because of her gender.

The case served before a full bench of judges in Bloemfontein on Friday, 30 November. The judges were Presiding Judge Maya, along with Judges Swain, Mathopo, Mocumie and Mothle.

The case ended up with the SCA after Judge President Makgoba ruled against Masindi in December 2016 in the Thohoyandou High Court. He was not impressed by the arguments presented and he questioned whether the applicants had exhausted all other avenues, such as the Commission on Traditional Leadership Disputes and Claims, to resolve the dispute. He was also not convinced that the issue of male primogeniture was central to the case. Masindi’s legal team appealed his ruling.

Masindi was represented by Advocate Alan Dodson (SC). The president of SA, the Minister of Co-operative Government and Traditional Affairs and the Commission on Traditional Leadership Disputes and Claims were represented by Advocate N Arendse (SC). Toni Mphephu Ramabulana and the Mphephu Ramabulana Royal Council were represented by Advocate IAM Semenya (SC).

 
 

 
 
 
 

2 Comments

To leave a comment you need to login / register first
  • Avatar
    Timmy Khethani 2 months ago

    This judgement is quite worrying. It's a pity that a matter like this has to be decided using western norms and values and to a certain extent the Constitution. I have a serious problem with this judgement because it tends to overlook the fact that traditional leadership is first and foremost a cultural institution where principles of democracy and the constitution take the back seat. Actually, the very existence of this institution is unconstitutional and undemocratic in the sense that it does not give every citizen equal access to the institution. I, Timmy Khethani, am decidedly disqualified to even aspire to become King of Vhavenda let alone to lay claim to the throne simply because I am considered to be of the wrong blood. Is that not discrimination ? Is it not a big irony that a court of law should then come to a judgement in an inherently discriminatory institution on the basis that somebody has been discriminated against because of that person's gender. The fact is discrimination is the conerstone of traditional leadership and its survival and preservation hinges largely on discrimination. Was the so-called discrimination against Masindi not done for the purpose of preserving the Ramabulana Kingship? At the risk of sounding chauvinistic methinks this judgement is totally illogical. It may be legally and constitutionally sound but it is extremely culturally flawed. Since Masindi's argument has always been that being the first child of the late Dimbanyika made her the first in line for the throne i now feel impelled to ask this question; What will happen when she, as the future sovereign of Vhavenda, departs this earth ? Taking her case as a precedence it will then mean that her first child will become king/queen. Now my question is will Masindi's children be necessarily of royal blood ? If not what happens ? And actually even if they are of royal blood will they come from the house of Ramabulana ?

  • Avatar
    Mudzanani Orries 2 months ago

    Ubva Maramanzhi...nne tsheo ya khothe ndi nga si i sole fhethu vhunga ri tshi tea u tshila zwi laedzwaho nga mulayo wa shango uri ri a edana zwi sa sedzi mbeu, arali ngoho Vho-Masindi naho vhe mufumakadzi , fhedzi vhe vhone vho tewaho nga u ri rangaphanda, kha zwi ralo ri do vha sala murahu sa murangaphanda kha vhuhosi ha vhavenda. ndaa!!!!!!!!!

 
 

Anton van Zyl

Anton van Zyl has been with the Zoutpansberger and Limpopo Mirror since 1990. He graduated at the the Rand Afrikaans University (now University of Johannesburg) and obtained a BA Communications degree. He is a founder member of the Association of Independent Publishers.

Email: anton@zoutnet.co.za

 
 

More photos...